No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistency

Last update: Dec 30, 2022

Related tags

Deep Learning TReS

Overview

This repository contains the implementation for the paper:

No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistency (WACV 2022) Video

Creat Environment

This code is train and test on Ubuntu 16.04 while using Anaconda, python 3.6.6, and pytorch 1.8.0. To set up the evironment run: conda env create -f environment.yml after installing the virtuall env you should be able to run python -c "import torch; print(torch.__version__)" in the terminal and see 1.8.0

Datasets

In this work we use 7 datasets for evaluation (LIVE, CSIQ, TID2013, KADID10K, CLIVE, KonIQ, LIVEFB)

To start training please make sure to follow the correct folder structure for each of the aformentioned datasets as provided bellow:

LIVE

live
    |--fastfading
    |    |  ...     
    |--blur
    |    |  ... 
    |--jp2k
    |    |  ...     
    |--jpeg
    |    |  ...     
    |--wn
    |    |  ...     
    |--refimgs
    |    |  ...     
    |--dmos.mat
    |--dmos_realigned.mat
    |--refnames_all.mat
    |--readme.txt

CSIQ

csiq
    |--dst_imgs_all
    |    |--1600.AWGN.1.png
    |    |  ... (you need to put all the distorted images here)
    |--src_imgs
    |    |--1600.png
    |    |  ...
    |--csiq.DMOS.xlsx
    |--csiq_label.txt

TID2013

tid2013
    |--distorted_images
    |--reference_images
    |--mos.txt
    |--mos_std.txt
    |--mos_with_names.txt
    |--readme

KADID10K

kadid10k
    |--distorted_images
    |    |--I01_01_01.png
    |    |  ...    
    |--reference_images
    |    |--I01.png
    |    |  ...    
    |--dmos.csv
    |--mv.sh.save
    |--mvv.sh

CLIVE

clive
    |--Data
    |    |--I01_01_01.png
    |    |  ...    
    |--Images
    |    |--I01.png
    |    |  ...    
    |--ChallengeDB_release
    |    |--README.txt
    |--dmos.csv
    |--mv.sh.save
    |--mvv.sh

KonIQ

fblive
   |--1024x768
   |    |  992920521.jpg 
   |    |  ... (all the images should be here)     
   |--koniq10k_scores_and_distributions.csv

LIVEFB

fblive
   |--FLIVE
   |    |  AVA__149.jpg    
   |    |  ... (all the images should be here)     
   |--labels_image.csv

Training

The training scrips are provided in the run.sh. Please change the paths correspondingly. Please note that to achive the same performace the parameters should match the ones in the run.sh files.

Pretrained models

The pretrain models are provided here.

Acknowledgement

This code is borrowed parts from HyperIQA and DETR.

FAQs

What is the difference between self-consistency and ensembling? and will the self-consistency increase the interface time?

In ensampling methods, we need to have several models (with different initializations) and ensemble the results during the training and testing, but in our self-consistency model, we enforce one model to have consistent performance for one network during the training while the network has an input with different transformations. Our self-consistency model has the same interface time/parameters in the testing similar to the model without self-consistency. In other words, we are not adding any new parameters to the network and it won't affect the interface.

What is the difference between self-consistency and augmentation?

In augmentation, we augment an input and send it to one network, so although the network will become robust to different augmentation, it will never have the chance of enforcing the outputs to be the same for different versions of an input at the same time. In our self-consistency approach, we force the network to have a similar output for an image with a different transformation (in our case horizontal flipping) which leads to more robust performance. Please also note that we still use augmentation during the training, so our model is benefiting from the advantages of both augmentation and self-consistency. Also, please see Fig. 1 in the main paper, where we showed that models that used augmentation alone are sensitive to simple transformations.

Why does the relative ranking loss apply to the samples with the highest and lowest quality scores, why not applying it to all the samples?

1) We did not see a significant improvement by applying our ranking loss to all the samples within each batch compared to the case that we just use extreme cases. 2) Considering more samples lead to more gradient back-propagation and therefore more computation during the training which causes slower training.

Citation

If you find this work useful for your research, please cite our paper:

@InProceedings{golestaneh2021no,
  title={No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistency},
  author={Golestaneh, S Alireza and Dadsetan, Saba and Kitani, Kris M},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision},
  pages={3209--3218},
  year={2022}
}

If you have any questions about our work, please do not hesitate to contact [email protected]

No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistency

Related tags

Overview

Creat Environment

Datasets

Training

Pretrained models

Acknowledgement

FAQs

Citation

Owner

Alireza Golestaneh

The official implementation of NeMo: Neural Mesh Models of Contrastive Features for Robust 3D Pose Estimation [ICLR-2021]. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.12378.pdf

Training Certifiably Robust Neural Networks with Efficient Local Lipschitz Bounds (Local-Lip)

The codes of paper 'Active-LATHE: An Active Learning Algorithm for Boosting the Error exponent for Learning Homogeneous Ising Trees'

Official PyTorch Implementation of paper "NeLF: Neural Light-transport Field for Single Portrait View Synthesis and Relighting", EGSR 2021.

Gradient-free global optimization algorithm for multidimensional functions based on the low rank tensor train format

Explaining Deep Neural Networks - A comparison of different CAM methods based on an insect data set

Finding all things on-prem Microsoft for password spraying and enumeration.

DANet for Tabular data classification/ regression.

Global-Local Path Networks for Monocular Depth Estimation with Vertical CutDepth [Paper]

Turning pixels into virtual points for multimodal 3D object detection.

Bridging the Gap between Label- and Reference based Synthesis(ICCV 2021)

Facebook AI Image Similarity Challenge: Descriptor Track

Replication package for the manuscript "Using Personality Detection Tools for Software Engineering Research: How Far Can We Go?" submitted to TOSEM

Implementation of average- and worst-case robust flatness measures for adversarial training.

Implementation of the federated dual coordinate descent (FedDCD) method.

Unofficial reimplementation of ECAPA-TDNN for speaker recognition (EER=0.86 for Vox1_O when train only in Vox2)

DeepFill v1/v2 with Contextual Attention and Gated Convolution, CVPR 2018, and ICCV 2019 Oral

Code for the paper: Audio-Visual Scene Analysis with Self-Supervised Multisensory Features

A large dataset of 100k Google Satellite and matching Map images, resembling pix2pix's Google Maps dataset.

A complete end-to-end demonstration in which we collect training data in Unity and use that data to train a deep neural network to predict the pose of a cube. This model is then deployed in a simulated robotic pick-and-place task.