A map update dataset and benchmark

Related tags

Deep Learningmuno21
Overview

MUNO21

MUNO21 is a dataset and benchmark for machine learning methods that automatically update and maintain digital street map datasets. Previous datasets focus on road extraction, and measure how well a method can infer a road network from aerial or satellite imagery. In contrast, MUNO21 measures how well a method can modify the road network data in an existing digital map dataset to make it reflect the latest physical road network visible from imagery. This task is more practical, since it doesn't throw away the existing map, but also more challenging, as physical roads may be constructed, bulldozed, or otherwise modified.

For more details, see https://favyen.com/muno21/.

This repository contains the code that was used to create MUNO21, as well as code for working with the dataset and computing evaluation metrics.

Requirements

Compiler and application requirements include the following. The versions are what we use and older versions make work as well.

  • Go 1.16+ (with older versions, module-aware mode must be enabled)
  • Python 3.5
  • osmium-tool 2.16.0 (only needed for dataset pre-processing)
  • ImageMagick 6.8 (only needed for dataset pre-processing)

Python requirements are in requirements.txt, and can be installed with:

pip install -r requirements.txt

These requirements should be sufficient to run dataset pre-processing, automatic candidate generation and clustering, visualization, metric evaluation, and post-processing with removing G_extra and fusing new roads into the base map.

To run the included map update methods, a range of additional requirements are needed, depending on the particular method:

  • TensorFlow 1.15 (not 2.0)
  • pytorch 1.7
  • scipy 1.4
  • OpenCV
  • rdp

Dataset

Obtaining the Dataset

Download and extract the MUNO21 dataset:

wget https://favyen.com/files/muno21.zip
unzip muno21.zip

In the commands below, we may assume that you have placed the dataset in /data/:

mv mapupdate/ /data/

The dataset includes aerial image and road network data in large tiles around several cities, along with annotations that specify the map update scenarios. Some steps below will require road network data to be extracted in windows corresponding to the scenarios:

cd muno21/go/
mkdir /data/identity
export PYTHONPATH=../python/
python ../methods/identity/run.py /data/graphs/graphs/ /data/annotations.json /data/identity/

Data Format

Aerial imagery is available as JPEG images in the naip/jpg/ folder. These images are obtained from NAIP.

Road networks are available as .graph files in the graphs/graphs folder. See https://favyen.com/muno21/graph-format.txt for a description of the data format of these files. Note that, in contrast to some other datasets, road networks are NOT represented as images -- instead, they are undirected spatial networks, where vertices are labeled with (x,y) coordinates and edges correspond to road segments. The (x,y) coordinates indicate pixels in the corresponding JPEG image.

Note that two versions of the road network are available in this format.

  • {region_x_y_time}.graph: only includes public roads suitable for motor vehicles.
  • {region_x_y_time}_all.graph: includes most other "ways" that appear in OpenStreetMap.

The original OpenStreetMap data is available in the graphs/osm/ folder, in files encoded under the OSM PBF format. Methods may take advantage of the additional information in these files, such as various road attributes. To convert longitude-latitude coordinates to pixel coordinates, see go/lib/regions.go and go/preprocess/osm_to_graph.go.

Task

The MUNO21 dataset includes 1,294 map update scenarios. Each scenario specifies a pre-change timestamp, post-change timestamp, and a bounding box window where some change occurred.

The input is aerial imagery from each of four years, along with road network data from a specific pre-change year (usually 2012 or 2013).

The ground truth label is the road network from a specific post-change year (usually 2018 or 2019) inside the bounding box window.

During training, a method may use all aerial imagery and road network data from the training regions (see train.json). To facilitate self-supervised learning, methods may also use all aerial imagery in the test regions (see test.json), but only road network data from 2012 or 2013 in those regions.

During inference, for a given scenario, a method has access to the same data that is available during training. It additionally has access to road network data from all regions at the pre-change timestamp, although since this is usually 2012 or 2013, this usually does not actually provide any more data.

The method should output a road network corresponding to the physical roads visible in the aerial imagery at the post-change timestamp inside the bounding box window.

Metrics

Methods are compared in terms of their precision-recall curves.

Recall measures how much closer the output road networks are to the ground truth data (post-change road network) than the pre-change road networks. Two alternative ways of comparing road networks, PixelF1 and APLS, are used.

Precision measures how frequently a method makes incorrect modifications to the road network in scenarios where no change has occurred between the pre- and post-change timestamps.

A method may expose a single real-valued parameter that provides a tradeoff between precision and recall. For example, a method that infers road networks using image segmentation may expose the segmentation probability confidence threshold for the "road" class as a parameter -- increasing this threshold generally provides higher precision but lower recall. Methods are compared in terms of their precision-recall curves when varying this parameter.

Scenario Specification

Scenarios are specified in the annotations.json file. Let annotation refer to one annotation JSON object.

Each scenario specifies a spatial window in pixel coordinates where the map has changed: annotation['Cluster']['Window']. A method may use imagery and road network data outside that window, but its output road network should span that window plus 128-pixel padding; it will be evaluated only inside the window (with no padding), but the padding ensures that the evaluation metrics are computed correctly along the boundary of the window.

Currently, the pre-change timestamp is always 2013, and the post-change timestamp is always the year of the most recent aerial image (either 2018 or 2019).

Infer Road Networks

Refer to the documentation in methods/{classify,recurrentunet,road_connectivity,roadtracerpp,sat2graph}.

Each method besides classify is taken from a publicly available implementation (see README in each method directory.) We make minor changes to make them work with MUNO21. We also find many bugs in road_connectivity which we have to manually fix, and we adapt Sat2Graph to work with Python3. road_connectivity and recurrentunet will only work with Python 2.7.

Post-process Inferred Road Networks

Applying a method to infer road networks should yield a directory containing subdirectories (corresponding to different confidence thresholds) that each contain .graph files. Most methods require post-processing under our map fusion approach before evaluation.

Suppose that you have computed the outputs of MAiD in /data/maid/out/. Then, for each confidence threshold:

mkdir /data/maid/fuse/
mkdir /data/maid/fuse/10/
go run postprocess/fuse.go /data/annotations.json normal /data/identity/ /data/maid/out/10/ /data/maid/fuse/10/

Optionally, visualize an inferred road network. Below, 6 can be changed to any annotation index corresponding to /data/annotations.json.

go run vis/visualize_inferred.go /data/annotations.json 6 /data/naip/jpg/ /data/graphs/graphs/ /data/maid/fuse/10/ default ./

The command above should produce an image ./6.jpg.

Evaluation

For each confidence threshold, run e.g.:

python metrics/apls.py /data/annotations.json /data/maid/fuse/10/ /data/graphs/graphs/ /data/test.json
go run metrics/geo.go /data/annotations.json /data/maid/fuse/10/ /data/graphs/graphs/ /data/test.json

Above, the first command computes APLS (which takes a long time to run) while the second computes PixelF1 (aka GEO metric). These commands produce scores.json and geo.json files respectively in the /data/maid/fuse/10/ directory containing metric outputs for each test scenario.

To obtain error rate:

go run metrics/error_rate.go /data/annotations.json /data/maid/fuse/10/ /data/graphs/graphs/ /data/test.json

To produce a precision-recall curve from the scores across multiple confidence thresholds, run:

python metrics/score_details.py /data/annotations.json /data/maid/fuse/{10,20,30,40,50}/geo.json

Building the Dataset

The documentation below outlines how the dataset was built. You do not need to follow these steps unless you are trying to replicate the dataset from raw NAIP aerial images from Google EarthEngine and OpenStreetMap history dumps.

Dataset Pre-processing

We preprocess raw NAIP and OSM data using the code in go/preprocess.

  1. Obtain NAIP images from Google EarthEngine.
  2. Obtain us-internal.osh.pbf from https://download.geofabrik.de/north-america/us.html
  3. Extract history around individual cities: go run preprocess/osm_space_filter.go /data/graphs/big/us-internal.osh.pbf /data/graphs/history/
  4. Extract OSM dumps at different times: python3 preprocess/osm_time_filter.py /data/graphs/history/ /data/graphs/osm/
  5. Convert NAIP images to JPG: python3 preprocess/tif_to_jpg.py /data/naip/tif/ /data/naip/jpg/
  6. Record the NAIP image sizes (needed for coordinate transforms and such): python3 preprocess/save_image_sizes.py /data/naip/jpg/ /data/sizes.json
  7. Convert to MUNO21 .graph file format: go run preprocess/osm_to_graph.go /data/graphs/osm/ /data/graphs/graphs/
  8. Randomly split the cities into train/test: python3 preprocess/pick_train_test.py /data/graphs/history/ /data/
  9. (Optional) Visualize the graph and image extracted at a tile: python3 vis/vis.py /data/naip/jpg/ny_1_0_2019.jpg /data/graphs/graphs/ny_1_0_2018-07-01.graph out.jpg

Candidate Generation and Clustering

We then generate and cluster candidates.

  1. Candidate generation: go run annotate/find_changed_roads.go /data/graphs/graphs/ /data/changes/
  2. Clustering: go run annotate/cluster_changes.go /data/changes/ /data/cluster/
  3. No-change windows: go run annotate/find_nochange.go /data/graphs/graphs/ /data/cluster-nochange/
  4. Output visualizations for annotation: go run annotate/visualize_clusters.go /data/cluster/ /data/naip/jpg/ /data/graphs/graphs/ /data/vis/

Annotation Post-processing

After using the annotation tools like go/annotate, we process the output annotations into JSON file:

  1. Convert annotation data to JSON: go run process_annotations.go /data/cluster/ /data/annotations.txt /data/cluster-nochange/ /data/annotations.json
PyTorch implementation of the paper: "Preference-Adaptive Meta-Learning for Cold-Start Recommendation", IJCAI, 2021.

PAML PyTorch implementation of the paper: "Preference-Adaptive Meta-Learning for Cold-Start Recommendation", IJCAI, 2021. (Continuously updating ) Int

15 Nov 18, 2022
Materials for upcoming beginner-friendly PyTorch course (work in progress).

Learn PyTorch for Deep Learning (work in progress) I'd like to learn PyTorch. So I'm going to use this repo to: Add what I've learned. Teach others in

Daniel Bourke 2.3k Dec 29, 2022
Multi-Task Learning as a Bargaining Game

Nash-MTL Official implementation of "Multi-Task Learning as a Bargaining Game". Setup environment conda create -n nashmtl python=3.9.7 conda activate

Aviv Navon 87 Dec 26, 2022
Julia package for contraction of tensor networks, based on the sweep line algorithm outlined in the paper General tensor network decoding of 2D Pauli codes

Julia package for contraction of tensor networks, based on the sweep line algorithm outlined in the paper General tensor network decoding of 2D Pauli codes

Christopher T. Chubb 35 Dec 21, 2022
Perturbed Self-Distillation: Weakly Supervised Large-Scale Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation (ICCV2021)

Perturbed Self-Distillation: Weakly Supervised Large-Scale Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation (ICCV2021) This is the implementation of PSD (ICCV 2021),

12 Dec 12, 2022
[ICCV 2021 Oral] Deep Evidential Action Recognition

DEAR (Deep Evidential Action Recognition) Project | Paper & Supp Wentao Bao, Qi Yu, Yu Kong International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV Oral), 2

Wentao Bao 80 Jan 03, 2023
AlgoVision - A Framework for Differentiable Algorithms and Algorithmic Supervision

NeurIPS 2021 Paper "Learning with Algorithmic Supervision via Continuous Relaxations"

Felix Petersen 76 Jan 01, 2023
Submanifold sparse convolutional networks

Submanifold Sparse Convolutional Networks This is the PyTorch library for training Submanifold Sparse Convolutional Networks. Spatial sparsity This li

Facebook Research 1.8k Jan 06, 2023
BBScan py3 - BBScan py3 With Python

BBScan_py3 This repository is forked from lijiejie/BBScan 1.5. I migrated the fo

baiyunfei 12 Dec 30, 2022
This repository includes the code of the sequence-to-sequence model for discontinuous constituent parsing described in paper Discontinuous Grammar as a Foreign Language.

Discontinuous Grammar as a Foreign Language This repository includes the code of the sequence-to-sequence model for discontinuous constituent parsing

Daniel Fernández-González 2 Apr 07, 2022
Quickly comparing your image classification models with the state-of-the-art models (such as DenseNet, ResNet, ...)

Image Classification Project Killer in PyTorch This repo is designed for those who want to start their experiments two days before the deadline and ki

349 Dec 08, 2022
"Structure-Augmented Text Representation Learning for Efficient Knowledge Graph Completion"(WWW 2021)

STAR_KGC This repo contains the source code of the paper accepted by WWW'2021. "Structure-Augmented Text Representation Learning for Efficient Knowled

Bo Wang 60 Dec 26, 2022
NAACL'2021: Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recall

OptiPrompt This is the PyTorch implementation of the paper Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recall. We propose OptiPrompt, a simple

Princeton Natural Language Processing 150 Dec 20, 2022
TensorFlow-based implementation of "Pyramid Scene Parsing Network".

PSPNet_tensorflow Important Code is fine for inference. However, the training code is just for reference and might be only used for fine-tuning. If yo

HsuanKung Yang 323 Dec 20, 2022
A bare-bones TensorFlow framework for Bayesian deep learning and Gaussian process approximation

Aboleth A bare-bones TensorFlow framework for Bayesian deep learning and Gaussian process approximation [1] with stochastic gradient variational Bayes

Gradient Institute 127 Dec 12, 2022
You Only Sample (Almost) Once: Linear Cost Self-Attention Via Bernoulli Sampling

You Only Sample (Almost) Once: Linear Cost Self-Attention Via Bernoulli Sampling Transformer-based models are widely used in natural language processi

Zhanpeng Zeng 12 Jan 01, 2023
Streamlit Tutorial (ex: stock price dashboard, cartoon-stylegan, vqgan-clip, stylemixing, styleclip, sefa)

Streamlit Tutorials Install pip install streamlit Run cd [directory] streamlit run app.py --server.address 0.0.0.0 --server.port [your port] # http:/

Jihye Back 30 Jan 06, 2023
Ensembling Off-the-shelf Models for GAN Training

Vision-aided GAN video (3m) | website | paper Can the collective knowledge from a large bank of pretrained vision models be leveraged to improve GAN t

345 Dec 28, 2022