CONTRIBUTIONS ONLY: Voluptuous, despite the name, is a Python data validation library.

Overview

CONTRIBUTIONS ONLY

What does this mean? I do not have time to fix issues myself. The only way fixes or new features will be added is by people submitting PRs.

Current status: Voluptuous is largely feature stable. There hasn't been a need to add new features in a while, but there are some bugs that should be fixed.

Why? I no longer use Voluptuous personally (in fact I no longer regularly write Python code). Rather than leave the project in a limbo of people filing issues and wondering why they're not being worked on, I believe this notice will more clearly set expectations.

Voluptuous is a Python data validation library

image image image Build Status Coverage Status Gitter chat

Voluptuous, despite the name, is a Python data validation library. It is primarily intended for validating data coming into Python as JSON, YAML, etc.

It has three goals:

  1. Simplicity.
  2. Support for complex data structures.
  3. Provide useful error messages.

Contact

Voluptuous now has a mailing list! Send a mail to [email protected] to subscribe. Instructions will follow.

You can also contact me directly via email or Twitter.

To file a bug, create a new issue on GitHub with a short example of how to replicate the issue.

Documentation

The documentation is provided here.

Changelog

See CHANGELOG.md.

Why use Voluptuous over another validation library?

Validators are simple callables: No need to subclass anything, just use a function.

Errors are simple exceptions: A validator can just raise Invalid(msg) and expect the user to get useful messages.

Schemas are basic Python data structures: Should your data be a dictionary of integer keys to strings? {int: str} does what you expect. List of integers, floats or strings? [int, float, str].

Designed from the ground up for validating more than just forms: Nested data structures are treated in the same way as any other type. Need a list of dictionaries? [{}]

Consistency: Types in the schema are checked as types. Values are compared as values. Callables are called to validate. Simple.

Show me an example

Twitter's user search API accepts query URLs like:

$ curl 'https://api.twitter.com/1.1/users/search.json?q=python&per_page=20&page=1'

To validate this we might use a schema like:

>>> from voluptuous import Schema
>>> schema = Schema({
...   'q': str,
...   'per_page': int,
...   'page': int,
... })

This schema very succinctly and roughly describes the data required by the API, and will work fine. But it has a few problems. Firstly, it doesn't fully express the constraints of the API. According to the API, per_page should be restricted to at most 20, defaulting to 5, for example. To describe the semantics of the API more accurately, our schema will need to be more thoroughly defined:

>>> from voluptuous import Required, All, Length, Range
>>> schema = Schema({
...   Required('q'): All(str, Length(min=1)),
...   Required('per_page', default=5): All(int, Range(min=1, max=20)),
...   'page': All(int, Range(min=0)),
... })

This schema fully enforces the interface defined in Twitter's documentation, and goes a little further for completeness.

"q" is required:

>>> from voluptuous import MultipleInvalid, Invalid
>>> try:
...   schema({})
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "required key not provided @ data['q']"
True

...must be a string:

>>> try:
...   schema({'q': 123})
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "expected str for dictionary value @ data['q']"
True

...and must be at least one character in length:

>>> try:
...   schema({'q': ''})
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "length of value must be at least 1 for dictionary value @ data['q']"
True
>>> schema({'q': '#topic'}) == {'q': '#topic', 'per_page': 5}
True

"per_page" is a positive integer no greater than 20:

>>> try:
...   schema({'q': '#topic', 'per_page': 900})
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "value must be at most 20 for dictionary value @ data['per_page']"
True
>>> try:
...   schema({'q': '#topic', 'per_page': -10})
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "value must be at least 1 for dictionary value @ data['per_page']"
True

"page" is an integer >= 0:

>>> try:
...   schema({'q': '#topic', 'per_page': 'one'})
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc)
"expected int for dictionary value @ data['per_page']"
>>> schema({'q': '#topic', 'page': 1}) == {'q': '#topic', 'page': 1, 'per_page': 5}
True

Defining schemas

Schemas are nested data structures consisting of dictionaries, lists, scalars and validators. Each node in the input schema is pattern matched against corresponding nodes in the input data.

Literals

Literals in the schema are matched using normal equality checks:

>>> schema = Schema(1)
>>> schema(1)
1
>>> schema = Schema('a string')
>>> schema('a string')
'a string'

Types

Types in the schema are matched by checking if the corresponding value is an instance of the type:

>>> schema = Schema(int)
>>> schema(1)
1
>>> try:
...   schema('one')
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "expected int"
True

URLs

URLs in the schema are matched by using urlparse library.

>>> from voluptuous import Url
>>> schema = Schema(Url())
>>> schema('http://w3.org')
'http://w3.org'
>>> try:
...   schema('one')
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "expected a URL"
True

Lists

Lists in the schema are treated as a set of valid values. Each element in the schema list is compared to each value in the input data:

>>> schema = Schema([1, 'a', 'string'])
>>> schema([1])
[1]
>>> schema([1, 1, 1])
[1, 1, 1]
>>> schema(['a', 1, 'string', 1, 'string'])
['a', 1, 'string', 1, 'string']

However, an empty list ([]) is treated as is. If you want to specify a list that can contain anything, specify it as list:

>>> schema = Schema([])
>>> try:
...   schema([1])
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "not a valid value @ data[1]"
True
>>> schema([])
[]
>>> schema = Schema(list)
>>> schema([])
[]
>>> schema([1, 2])
[1, 2]

Sets and frozensets

Sets and frozensets are treated as a set of valid values. Each element in the schema set is compared to each value in the input data:

>>> schema = Schema({42})
>>> schema({42}) == {42}
True
>>> try:
...   schema({43})
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "invalid value in set"
True
>>> schema = Schema({int})
>>> schema({1, 2, 3}) == {1, 2, 3}
True
>>> schema = Schema({int, str})
>>> schema({1, 2, 'abc'}) == {1, 2, 'abc'}
True
>>> schema = Schema(frozenset([int]))
>>> try:
...   schema({3})
...   raise AssertionError('Invalid not raised')
... except Invalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == 'expected a frozenset'
True

However, an empty set (set()) is treated as is. If you want to specify a set that can contain anything, specify it as set:

>>> schema = Schema(set())
>>> try:
...   schema({1})
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "invalid value in set"
True
>>> schema(set()) == set()
True
>>> schema = Schema(set)
>>> schema({1, 2}) == {1, 2}
True

Validation functions

Validators are simple callables that raise an Invalid exception when they encounter invalid data. The criteria for determining validity is entirely up to the implementation; it may check that a value is a valid username with pwd.getpwnam(), it may check that a value is of a specific type, and so on.

The simplest kind of validator is a Python function that raises ValueError when its argument is invalid. Conveniently, many builtin Python functions have this property. Here's an example of a date validator:

>>> from datetime import datetime
>>> def Date(fmt='%Y-%m-%d'):
...   return lambda v: datetime.strptime(v, fmt)
>>> schema = Schema(Date())
>>> schema('2013-03-03')
datetime.datetime(2013, 3, 3, 0, 0)
>>> try:
...   schema('2013-03')
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "not a valid value"
True

In addition to simply determining if a value is valid, validators may mutate the value into a valid form. An example of this is the Coerce(type) function, which returns a function that coerces its argument to the given type:

def Coerce(type, msg=None):
    """Coerce a value to a type.

    If the type constructor throws a ValueError, the value will be marked as
    Invalid.
    """
    def f(v):
        try:
            return type(v)
        except ValueError:
            raise Invalid(msg or ('expected %s' % type.__name__))
    return f

This example also shows a common idiom where an optional human-readable message can be provided. This can vastly improve the usefulness of the resulting error messages.

Dictionaries

Each key-value pair in a schema dictionary is validated against each key-value pair in the corresponding data dictionary:

>>> schema = Schema({1: 'one', 2: 'two'})
>>> schema({1: 'one'})
{1: 'one'}

Extra dictionary keys

By default any additional keys in the data, not in the schema will trigger exceptions:

>>> schema = Schema({2: 3})
>>> try:
...   schema({1: 2, 2: 3})
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "extra keys not allowed @ data[1]"
True

This behaviour can be altered on a per-schema basis. To allow additional keys use Schema(..., extra=ALLOW_EXTRA):

>>> from voluptuous import ALLOW_EXTRA
>>> schema = Schema({2: 3}, extra=ALLOW_EXTRA)
>>> schema({1: 2, 2: 3})
{1: 2, 2: 3}

To remove additional keys use Schema(..., extra=REMOVE_EXTRA):

>>> from voluptuous import REMOVE_EXTRA
>>> schema = Schema({2: 3}, extra=REMOVE_EXTRA)
>>> schema({1: 2, 2: 3})
{2: 3}

It can also be overridden per-dictionary by using the catch-all marker token extra as a key:

>>> from voluptuous import Extra
>>> schema = Schema({1: {Extra: object}})
>>> schema({1: {'foo': 'bar'}})
{1: {'foo': 'bar'}}

Required dictionary keys

By default, keys in the schema are not required to be in the data:

>>> schema = Schema({1: 2, 3: 4})
>>> schema({3: 4})
{3: 4}

Similarly to how extra_ keys work, this behaviour can be overridden per-schema:

>>> schema = Schema({1: 2, 3: 4}, required=True)
>>> try:
...   schema({3: 4})
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "required key not provided @ data[1]"
True

And per-key, with the marker token Required(key):

>>> schema = Schema({Required(1): 2, 3: 4})
>>> try:
...   schema({3: 4})
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "required key not provided @ data[1]"
True
>>> schema({1: 2})
{1: 2}

Optional dictionary keys

If a schema has required=True, keys may be individually marked as optional using the marker token Optional(key):

>>> from voluptuous import Optional
>>> schema = Schema({1: 2, Optional(3): 4}, required=True)
>>> try:
...   schema({})
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "required key not provided @ data[1]"
True
>>> schema({1: 2})
{1: 2}
>>> try:
...   schema({1: 2, 4: 5})
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "extra keys not allowed @ data[4]"
True
>>> schema({1: 2, 3: 4})
{1: 2, 3: 4}

Recursive / nested schema

You can use voluptuous.Self to define a nested schema:

>>> from voluptuous import Schema, Self
>>> recursive = Schema({"more": Self, "value": int})
>>> recursive({"more": {"value": 42}, "value": 41}) == {'more': {'value': 42}, 'value': 41}
True

Extending an existing Schema

Often it comes handy to have a base Schema that is extended with more requirements. In that case you can use Schema.extend to create a new Schema:

>>> from voluptuous import Schema
>>> person = Schema({'name': str})
>>> person_with_age = person.extend({'age': int})
>>> sorted(list(person_with_age.schema.keys()))
['age', 'name']

The original Schema remains unchanged.

Objects

Each key-value pair in a schema dictionary is validated against each attribute-value pair in the corresponding object:

>>> from voluptuous import Object
>>> class Structure(object):
...     def __init__(self, q=None):
...         self.q = q
...     def __repr__(self):
...         return '<Structure(q={0.q!r})>'.format(self)
...
>>> schema = Schema(Object({'q': 'one'}, cls=Structure))
>>> schema(Structure(q='one'))
<Structure(q='one')>

Allow None values

To allow value to be None as well, use Any:

>>> from voluptuous import Any

>>> schema = Schema(Any(None, int))
>>> schema(None)
>>> schema(5)
5

Error reporting

Validators must throw an Invalid exception if invalid data is passed to them. All other exceptions are treated as errors in the validator and will not be caught.

Each Invalid exception has an associated path attribute representing the path in the data structure to our currently validating value, as well as an error_message attribute that contains the message of the original exception. This is especially useful when you want to catch Invalid exceptions and give some feedback to the user, for instance in the context of an HTTP API.

>>> def validate_email(email):
...     """Validate email."""
...     if not "@" in email:
...         raise Invalid("This email is invalid.")
...     return email
>>> schema = Schema({"email": validate_email})
>>> exc = None
>>> try:
...     schema({"email": "whatever"})
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...     exc = e
>>> str(exc)
"This email is invalid. for dictionary value @ data['email']"
>>> exc.path
['email']
>>> exc.msg
'This email is invalid.'
>>> exc.error_message
'This email is invalid.'

The path attribute is used during error reporting, but also during matching to determine whether an error should be reported to the user or if the next match should be attempted. This is determined by comparing the depth of the path where the check is, to the depth of the path where the error occurred. If the error is more than one level deeper, it is reported.

The upshot of this is that matching is depth-first and fail-fast.

To illustrate this, here is an example schema:

>>> schema = Schema([[2, 3], 6])

Each value in the top-level list is matched depth-first in-order. Given input data of [[6]], the inner list will match the first element of the schema, but the literal 6 will not match any of the elements of that list. This error will be reported back to the user immediately. No backtracking is attempted:

>>> try:
...   schema([[6]])
...   raise AssertionError('MultipleInvalid not raised')
... except MultipleInvalid as e:
...   exc = e
>>> str(exc) == "not a valid value @ data[0][0]"
True

If we pass the data [6], the 6 is not a list type and so will not recurse into the first element of the schema. Matching will continue on to the second element in the schema, and succeed:

>>> schema([6])
[6]

Multi-field validation

Validation rules that involve multiple fields can be implemented as custom validators. It's recommended to use All() to do a two-pass validation - the first pass checking the basic structure of the data, and only after that, the second pass applying your cross-field validator:

def passwords_must_match(passwords):
    if passwords['password'] != passwords['password_again']:
        raise Invalid('passwords must match')
    return passwords

s=Schema(All(
    # First "pass" for field types
    {'password':str, 'password_again':str},
    # Follow up the first "pass" with your multi-field rules
    passwords_must_match
))

# valid
s({'password':'123', 'password_again':'123'})

# raises MultipleInvalid: passwords must match
s({'password':'123', 'password_again':'and now for something completely different'})

With this structure, your multi-field validator will run with pre-validated data from the first "pass" and so will not have to do its own type checking on its inputs.

The flipside is that if the first "pass" of validation fails, your cross-field validator will not run:

# raises Invalid because password_again is not a string
# passwords_must_match() will not run because first-pass validation already failed
s({'password':'123', 'password_again': 1337})

Running tests

Voluptuous is using nosetests:

$ nosetests

Other libraries and inspirations

Voluptuous is heavily inspired by Validino, and to a lesser extent, jsonvalidator and json_schema.

pytest-voluptuous is a pytest plugin that helps in using voluptuous validators in asserts.

I greatly prefer the light-weight style promoted by these libraries to the complexity of libraries like FormEncode.

Comments
  • Feature

    Feature

    Varify the maximum number of digits that are present in the number(Precision), and the maximum number of decimal places(Scale)

    :raises Invalid: If the value does not match the provided Precision and Scale.
    
    >>> s = Schema(Number(precision=6, scale=2))
    
    in progress 
    opened by nareshnootoo 18
  • Fix auto updation travis issue

    Fix auto updation travis issue

    Hey @alecthomas

    Now everything is working as desired. Please see the updated documentation over here. As you can see here Number is added, which shows that documentation is getting auto-updated.

    Thanks

    opened by tusharmakkar08 15
  • Argument validation decorator

    Argument validation decorator

    Introducing decorator that is able to validate input arguments and return value of the decorated function.

    Before calling the wrapped function, the validators specified in the decorator's argument list will be tested against the values passed at the function call.

    @validate_schema(arg1=int, arg2=int)
    def foo(arg1, arg2):
      return arg1 * arg2
    

    After calling the function with the validated arguments, schema specified in RETURNS_KEY (currently __returns__) will be applied against the output.

    @validate_schema(arg1=int, arg2=int, __returns__=int)
    def foo(arg1, arg2):
      return arg1 * arg2
    

    See more in the related test cases.

    opened by justcallmegreg 13
  • Voluptuous cannot support multi-field validation

    Voluptuous cannot support multi-field validation

    Hi @alecthomas, it looks like Voluptuous is not super active, but I thought I'd raise an architectural point with you. It seems like there's no way to write a validation which depends on the value of another field. For example, there's no way to require that a field called password and confirm_password actually match. Or that a field called size actually refers to a size that is in stock for the product referenced by product_id.

    Am I wrong, and if so, how would I do those kinds of validations? If not, are there any plans to support them?

    opened by jessedhillon 12
  • default_to() with dict doesn't appear to work

    default_to() with dict doesn't appear to work

    I was happy to find the default_to() validator to return defaults while validating a yaml document.

    Unfortunately it only seems to work in literals and lists and is not able to create dictionary keys. Is that possible? Or perhaps I'm using it wrong?

        schema1 = Schema({
            'sudo':  default_to(True),
        })
        print schema1({})
    
        schema2 = Schema([default_to(True)])
        print schema2([None])
    

    prints

    {}
    [True]
    

    I also tried giving the field as None, but then it breaks what I really want to do:

        schema1 = Schema({
            'sudo':  all(bool, default_to(True)),
        })
        print schema1({'sudo':None})
    
    voluptuous.InvalidList: expected bool for dictionary value @ data['sudo']
    
    opened by mixmastamyk 11
  • Error returned by

    Error returned by "Any" dict validator should be of the closest alternative

    Validation of Any(..) is done in the order in which the alternatives are written. When using dicts, if none of them match, the deepest error is returned. The error (that is returned in the end) is updated only when it is more nested in an alternate dict than the already existing error.

    If all dicts are of the same level, the error is from the first dict in Any(..). It would be better if Any() is made to return the error of the closest alternative. Or provide a discriminant function in the parameters used to generate error messages.

    For the example below the validation error for all three types is at the same level of the dict. The error for type A is returned as that is the first to be validated.

    from voluptuous import Schema
    
    sch = Schema({
        # this field is keyed by 'type'
        'implementation': Any({
            'type': 'A',
            'a-value': str,
        }, {
            'type': 'B',
            'b-value': int,
        }, {
            'type': 'C',
            'c-value': bool,
        })  
    })
    
    # should be OK
    sch({
        'implementation': {
            'type': 'A',
            'a-value': 'hello',}  
    })
    
    # but this one gives a very confusing error message, because Voluptuous does
    # not realize this is a (malformed) type-C implementation. Most confusingly,
    # it says the value for 'type' is not allowed, when really it is!
    # raises(
    #     er.MultipleInvalid, 
    #    'extra keys not allowed @ data['implementation']['c-value']', 
    #    'not a valid value for dictionary value @ data['implementation']['type']'
    # )
    
    sch({                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
        'implementation': {
            'type': 'C',
            'c-value': None, }
    })
    

    Probably, the error best suited here is

    expected str for dictionary value @ data['implementation']['c-value']
    

    Maybe we could return the one with shortest errors list (https://github.com/alecthomas/voluptuous/blob/master/voluptuous/schema_builder.py#L536) among all alternatives. Original discussion on BMO (reported by @djmitche)

    opened by ydidwania 10
  • add Schema.infer method

    add Schema.infer method

    This introduces the class method Schema.infer, to infer a Schema from concrete data. This will be useful for converting existing known-good data (e.g. API responses) into enforceable schemas.

    opened by dtao 10
  • Should default values fail validation?

    Should default values fail validation?

    In using voluptuous, we've come across a few cases where the following code is written:

    s = Schema({
        Optional('key', default=None): int,
    })
    

    This behaves as:

    >>> s({})
    {'key': None}
    >>> s({'key': 3})
    {'key': 3}
    

    but s({'key': None}) raises a validation error:

    voluptuous.error.MultipleInvalid: expected int for dictionary value @ data['key']
    

    On one hand, this is true as the schema specifies that the value, if provided, must be of type int.

    But, on the other hand, the developer may have expected Optional('key', default=None): int to behave as Optional('key', default=None): Any(None, int) which gives the intended behaviour:

    >>> s({})
    {'key': None}
    >>> s({'key': 3})
    {'key': 3}
    >>> s({'key': None})
    {'key': None}
    

    So the question is: if the default value on its own does not validate against the schema of the value, should that raise an error?

    I believe this issue is different from https://github.com/alecthomas/voluptuous/issues/233 as that issue is about evaluating nested default values without duplication.

    opened by svisser 10
  • Porting to new version issue

    Porting to new version issue

    Am trying to port my program from .4x to the latest. Unfortunately I was subclassing Schema to augment validate_dict. However, in the new version I no longer have access to it, since all of those functions were moved within others. What should I do?

    opened by mixmastamyk 10
  • Conflicts with Python's builtin

    Conflicts with Python's builtin

    I work @Ludia on Dynamodb-mapper projects and plan to use Voluptous as the validation layer. I love it's extremely simple syntax and ability to validate nested structures.

    Sadly, a couple of packaged validators (all and range) conflicts with Python's builtin (http://docs.python.org/library/functions.html).

    Would you accept a pull request converting the lowercasesyntaxforvalidator to CamelCaseSyntaxForValidators ?

    opened by yadutaf 10
  • More flexible schema definition

    More flexible schema definition

    We needed to be able to change schema depending on countries, and for example maybe sometimes we just want to change if a field is required or not.

    The way generally you declare voluptuous schemas doesn't make it very easy, so we just did a small function to translate from our format to voluptuous format, and we can write things like:

    MY_SCHEMA = {
        'id': Field(required=True, type=unicode),
        'choice': Field(required=True, type=V.Any('main', 'secondary')),
        'subinfo': SubSchema(SUB_SCHEMA),
    }
    

    it works quite well for us, if that's something that might be interesting to include in voluptuous let me know!

    Thanks

    opened by AndreaCrotti 9
  • No description at PyPI project page

    No description at PyPI project page

    The PyPI project page at https://pypi.org/project/voluptuous/ is missing project description. The page just says No project description provided. I believe voluptuous deserves some description, for example data validation library.

    opened by mtelka 0
  • Description argument not documented

    Description argument not documented

    The description argument for the Marker class (or any subclass) is not documented anywhere, so it's unclear what's allowed and how it affects the schema.

    opened by steverep 2
  • Ensure `sorted` in `In` works with container of data types

    Ensure `sorted` in `In` works with container of data types

    Alternative to https://github.com/alecthomas/voluptuous/pull/452

    I would prefer to keep the sorting, since that IMHO improves the error message we return, especially when utilized in user facing use cases.

    This PR nonetheless ensures we properly handle containers with data types.

    opened by spacegaier 2
  • Do not use sorted()

    Do not use sorted()

    Version 12.1 (commit https://github.com/alecthomas/voluptuous/pull/436/commits/111e1c25c6bcfbbd0da9fdb4fcc1370ffa111169) adds call of sorted function. This leads to application crash when schema container contains not comparable pair of elements. Example:

    >>> import voluptuous as vlps
    >>> s = vlps.Schema(vlps.In((str, int, float)))
    >>> d = s(42)
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/code.py", line 90, in runcode
        exec(code, self.locals)
      File "<input>", line 3, in <module>
      File ".../lib/python3.9/site-packages/voluptuous/schema_builder.py", line 272, in __call__
        return self._compiled([], data)
      File ".../lib/python3.9/site-packages/voluptuous/schema_builder.py", line 817, in validate_callable
        return schema(data)
      File ".../lib/python3.9/site-packages/voluptuous/validators.py", line 741, in __call__
        'value must be one of {}'.format(sorted(self.container)))
    TypeError: '<' not supported between instances of 'type' and 'type'
    

    This function should not be used, as it limits the possibilities of use without giving anything in return.

    opened by Avorthoren 0
  • Required keys aren't detected in Object

    Required keys aren't detected in Object

    Just leaving this here for anyone else experiencing this issue

    
    # this fails with voluptuous.error.MultipleInvalid: required key not provided @ data['test'][0]['ok']
    Schema({'test': (Object({'ok': 1}),)}, required=True)({'test': ({'ok': 1},)})
    
    # but this works
    Schema({'test': ({'ok': 1},)}, required=True)({'test': ({'ok': 1},)})
    opened by twiddli 0
Releases(0.13.1)
  • 0.13.1(Apr 7, 2022)

    Fixes:

    • #439: Ignore Enum if it is unavailable
    • #456: Fix email regex match for Python 2.7

    New:

    • #457: Enable github actions
    • #462: Convert codebase to adhere to flake8 W504 (PEP 8)
    • #459: Enable flake8 in github actions
    • #464: pytest migration + enable Python 3.10

    New Contributors:

    • @epenet Thank you for setting up the Github actions

    Full Changelog: https://github.com/alecthomas/voluptuous/compare/0.13.0...0.13.1

    Source code(tar.gz)
    Source code(zip)
  • 0.13.0(Apr 7, 2022)

  • 0.12.2(Mar 30, 2022)

  • 0.12.1(Dec 6, 2020)

    Changes:

    • #435: Extended a few tests (Required and In)
    • #425: Improve error message for In and NotIn
    • #436: Add sorted() for In and NotIn + fix tests
    • #437: Grouped Maybe tests plus added another Range test
    • #438: Extend tests for Schema with empty list or dict

    New:

    • #433: Add Python 3.9 support

    Fixes:

    • #431: Fixed typos + made spelling more consistent
    • #411: Ensure Maybe propagates error information
    • #434: Remove value enumeration when validating empty list
    Source code(tar.gz)
    Source code(zip)
  • 0.12.0(Dec 6, 2020)

    Changes:

    • n/a

    New:

    • #368: Allow a discriminant field in validators

    Fixes:

    • #420: Fixed issue with 'required' not being set properly and added test
    • #414: Handle incomparable values in Range
    • #427: Added additional tests for Range, Clamp and Length + catch TypeError exceptions
    Source code(tar.gz)
    Source code(zip)
  • 0.9.3(Aug 10, 2016)

Turn a STAC catalog into a dask-based xarray

StackSTAC Turn a list of STAC items into a 4D xarray DataArray (dims: time, band, y, x), including reprojection to a common grid. The array is a lazy

Gabe Joseph 148 Dec 19, 2022
Python histogram library - histograms as updateable, fully semantic objects with visualization tools. [P]ython [HYST]ograms.

physt P(i/y)thon h(i/y)stograms. Inspired (and based on) numpy.histogram, but designed for humans(TM) on steroids(TM). The goal is to unify different

Jan Pipek 120 Dec 08, 2022
Interactive Data Visualization in the browser, from Python

Bokeh is an interactive visualization library for modern web browsers. It provides elegant, concise construction of versatile graphics, and affords hi

Bokeh 17.1k Dec 31, 2022
visualize_ML is a python package made to visualize some of the steps involved while dealing with a Machine Learning problem

visualize_ML visualize_ML is a python package made to visualize some of the steps involved while dealing with a Machine Learning problem. It is build

Ayush Singh 164 Dec 12, 2022
Homework 2: Matplotlib and Data Visualization

Homework 2: Matplotlib and Data Visualization Overview These data visualizations were created for my introductory computer science course using Python

Sophia Huang 12 Oct 20, 2022
LabGraph is a a Python-first framework used to build sophisticated research systems with real-time streaming, graph API, and parallelism.

LabGraph is a a Python-first framework used to build sophisticated research systems with real-time streaming, graph API, and parallelism.

MLH Fellowship 7 Oct 05, 2022
HW 02 for CS40 - matplotlib practice

HW 02 for CS40 - matplotlib practice project instructions https://github.com/mikeizbicki/cmc-csci040/tree/2021fall/hw_02 Drake Lyric Analysis Bar Char

13 Oct 27, 2021
Python scripts for plotting audiograms and related data from Interacoustics Equinox audiometer and Otoaccess software.

audiometry Python scripts for plotting audiograms and related data from Interacoustics Equinox 2.0 audiometer and Otoaccess software. Maybe similar sc

Hamilton Lab at UT Austin 2 Jun 15, 2022
A GUI for Pandas DataFrames

About Demo Installation Usage Features More Info About PandasGUI is a GUI for viewing, plotting and analyzing Pandas DataFrames. Demo Installation Ins

Adam Rose 2.8k Dec 24, 2022
The Spectral Diagram (SD) is a new tool for the comparison of time series in the frequency domain

The Spectral Diagram (SD) is a new tool for the comparison of time series in the frequency domain. The SD provides a novel way to display the coherence function, power, amplitude, phase, and skill sc

Mabel 3 Oct 10, 2022
Automatically generate GitHub activity!

Commit Bot Automatically generate GitHub activity! We've all wanted to be the developer that commits every day, but that requires a lot of work. Let's

Ricky 4 Jun 07, 2022
Generating interfaces(CLI, Qt GUI, Dash web app) from a Python function.

oneFace is a Python library for automatically generating multiple interfaces(CLI, GUI, WebGUI) from a callable Python object. oneFace is an easy way t

NaNg 31 Oct 21, 2022
finds grocery stores and stuff next to route (gpx)

Route-Report Route report is a command-line utility that can be used to locate points-of-interest near your planned route (gpx). The results are based

Clemens Mosig 5 Oct 10, 2022
Typical: Fast, simple, & correct data-validation using Python 3 typing.

typical: Python's Typing Toolkit Introduction Typical is a library devoted to runtime analysis, inference, validation, and enforcement of Python types

Sean 171 Jan 02, 2023
A dashboard built using Plotly-Dash for interactive visualization of Dex-connected individuals across the country.

Dashboard For The DexConnect Platform of Dexterity Global Working prototype submission for internship at Dexterity Global Group. Dashboard for real ti

Yashasvi Misra 2 Jun 15, 2021
Lightspin AWS IAM Vulnerability Scanner

Red-Shadow Lightspin AWS IAM Vulnerability Scanner Description Scan your AWS IAM Configuration for shadow admins in AWS IAM based on misconfigured den

Lightspin 90 Dec 14, 2022
WhatsApp Chat Analyzer is a WebApp and it can be used by anyone to analyze their chat. 😄

WhatsApp-Chat-Analyzer You can view the working project here. WhatsApp chat Analyzer is a WebApp where anyone either tech or non-tech person can analy

Prem Chandra Singh 26 Nov 02, 2022
Python support for Godot 🐍🐍🐍

Godot Python, because you want Python on Godot ! The goal of this project is to provide Python language support as a scripting module for the Godot ga

Emmanuel Leblond 1.4k Jan 04, 2023
Draw datasets from within Jupyter.

drawdata This small python app allows you to draw a dataset in a jupyter notebook. This should be very useful when teaching machine learning algorithm

vincent d warmerdam 505 Nov 27, 2022
Import, visualize, and analyze SpiderFoot OSINT data in Neo4j, a graph database

SpiderFoot Neo4j Tools Import, visualize, and analyze SpiderFoot OSINT data in Neo4j, a graph database Step 1: Installation NOTE: This installs the sf

Black Lantern Security 42 Dec 26, 2022