Orthogonal Projection Loss (ICCV'21)
Kanchana Ranasinghe, Muzammal Naseer, Munawar Hayat, Salman Khan, & Fahad Shahbaz Khan
Paper Link | Project Page | Video
Abstract: Deep neural networks have achieved remarkable performance on a range of classification tasks, with softmax cross-entropy (CE) loss emerging as the de-facto objective function. The CE loss encourages features of a class to have a higher projection score on the true class-vector compared to the negative classes. However, this is a relative constraint and does not explicitly force different class features to be well-separated. Motivated by the observation that ground-truth class representations in CE loss are orthogonal (one-hot encoded vectors), we develop a novel loss function termed “Orthogonal Projection Loss” (OPL) which imposes orthogonality in the feature space. OPL augments the properties of CE loss and directly enforces inter-class separation alongside intra-class clustering in the feature space through orthogonality constraints on the mini-batch level. As compared to other alternatives of CE, OPL offers unique advantages e.g., no additional learnable parameters, does not require careful negative mining and is not sensitive to the batch size. Given the plug-and-play nature of OPL, we evaluate it on a diverse range of tasks including image recognition (CIFAR-100), large-scale classification (ImageNet), domain generalization (PACS) and few-shot learning (miniImageNet, CIFAR-FS, tiered-ImageNet and Meta-dataset) and demonstrate its effectiveness across the board. Furthermore, OPL offers better robustness against practical nuisances such as adversarial attacks and label noise.
Citation
@InProceedings{Ranasinghe_2021_ICCV,
author = {Ranasinghe, Kanchana and Naseer, Muzammal and Hayat, Munawar and Khan, Salman and Khan, Fahad Shahbaz},
title = {Orthogonal Projection Loss},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)},
month = {October},
year = {2021},
pages = {12333-12343}
}
Table of Contents
- Contributions
- Usage
- Pretrained Models
- Training
- Evaluation
- What Can You Do?
- Quantitative Results
- Qualitative Results
Contributions
- We propose a novel loss, OPL, that directly enforces inter-class separation and intra-class clustering via orthogonality constraints on the feature space with no additional learnable parameters.
- Our orthogonality constraints are efficiently formulated in comparison to existing methods, allowing mini-batch processing without the need for explicit calculation of singular values. This leads to a simple vectorized implementation of OPL directly integrating with CE.
- We conduct extensive evaluations on a diverse range of image classification tasks highlighting the discriminative ability of OPL. Further, our results on few-shot learning (FSL) and domain generalization (DG) datasets establish the transferability and generalizability of features learned with OPL. Finally, we establish the improved robustness of learned features to adversarial attacks and label noise.
Usage
Refer to requirements.txt for dependencies. Orthogonal Projection Loss (OPL) can be simply plugged-in with any standard loss function similar to Softmax Cross-Entropy Loss (CE) as below. You may need to edit the forward function of your model to output features (we use the penultimate feature maps) alongside the final logits. You can set the gamma and lambda values to default as 0.5 and 1 respectively.
import torch.nn.functional as F
from loss import OrthogonalProjectionLoss
ce_loss = F.cross_entropy
op_loss = OrthogonalProjectionLoss(gamma=0.5)
op_lambda = 1
for inputs, targets in dataloader:
features, logits = model(inputs)
loss_op = op_loss(features, targets)
loss_ce = ce_loss(logits, targets)
loss = loss_ce + op_lambda * loss_op
loss.backward()
Pretrained Models
If you find our OPL pretrained models useful, please consider citing our work.
Training
Refer to the sub-folders for CIFAR-100 (cifar), ImageNet (imagenet), few-shot learning (rfs) training, and label noise training (truncated_loss). The README.MD within each directory contains the training instructions for that task.
Evaluation
Refer to the relevant sub-folders (same as in Training above). You can find the pretrained models for these tasks on our releases page.
What Can You Do?
For future work, we hope to explore the following:
- Test how OPL can be adapted for un-supervised representation learning
- Test the performance of OPL on more architectures (e.g. vision transformers)
- Test how OPL performs on class-imbalanced datasets
Quantitative Results
We present qualitative results for training with OPL (against a CE only backbone) for various classification tasks.
Classification: ImageNet
| Model Backbone | ResNet-18 | ResNet-18 | ResNet-50 | ResNet-50 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| top-1 | top-5 | top-1 | top-5 | |
| CE (Baseline) | 69.91% | 89.08% | 76.15% | 92.87% |
| CE + OPL (ours) | 70.27% | 89.60% | 76.98% | 93.30% |
Classification: Few Shot
| Method | New Loss | Cifar:1shot | Cifar:5shot | Mini:1shot | Mini:5shot | Tier:1shot | Tier:5shot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAML | ✗ | 58.90±1.9 | 71.50±1.0 | 48.70±1.84 | 63.11±0.92 | 51.67±1.81 | 70.30±1.75 |
| Prototypical Networks | ✗ | 55.50±0.7 | 72.00±0.6 | 49.42±0.78 | 68.20±0.66 | 53.31±0.89 | 72.69±0.74 |
| Relation Networks | ✗ | 55.00±1.0 | 69.30±0.8 | 50.44±0.82 | 65.32±0.70 | 54.48±0.93 | 71.32±0.78 |
| Shot-Free | ✗ | 69.20±N/A | 84.70±N/A | 59.04±N/A | 77.64±N/A | 63.52±N/A | 82.59±N/A |
| MetaOptNet | ✗ | 72.60±0.7 | 84.30±0.5 | 62.64±0.61 | 78.63±0.46 | 65.99±0.72 | 81.56±0.53 |
| RFS | ✗ | 71.45±0.8 | 85.95±0.5 | 62.02±0.60 | 79.64±0.44 | 69.74±0.72 | 84.41±0.55 |
| RFS + OPL (Ours) |
|
73.02±0.4 | 86.12±0.2 | 63.10±0.36 | 79.87±0.26 | 70.20±0.41 | 85.01±0.27 |
| NAML |
|
- | - | 65.42±0.25 | 75.48±0.34 | - | - |
| Neg-Cosine |
|
- | - | 63.85±0.81 | 81.57±0.56 | - | - |
| SKD |
|
74.50±0.9 | 88.00±0.6 | 65.93±0.81 | 83.15±0.54 | 71.69±0.91 | 86.66±0.60 |
| SKD + OPL (Ours) |
|
74.94±0.4 | 88.06±0.3 | 66.90±0.37 | 83.23±0.25 | 72.10±0.41 | 86.70±0.27 |
Classification: Label Noise
| Dataset | Method | Uniform | Class Dependent |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIFAR10 | TL | 87.62% | 82.28% |
| TL+OPL | 88.45% | 87.02% | |
| CIFAR100 | TL | 62.64% | 47.66% |
| TL+OPL | 65.62% | 53.94% |
Qualitative Results
We present some examples for qualitative improvements over imagenet below.
36 Oct 31, 2022
2.2k Jan 09, 2023
40 Dec 29, 2022
569 Dec 21, 2022
157 Dec 26, 2022
5 Dec 13, 2021
2 Dec 24, 2021
143 Dec 13, 2022
23 Dec 02, 2022
621 Jan 08, 2023
66 Dec 16, 2022
48 Dec 28, 2022
0 Jan 11, 2022
66 Nov 16, 2022
2.1k Dec 29, 2022
13 Dec 09, 2022
87 Jan 05, 2023
6 Jan 08, 2022
63 Dec 16, 2022
44 Nov 30, 2022