The CLRS Algorithmic Reasoning Benchmark
Learning representations of algorithms is an emerging area of machine learning, seeking to bridge concepts from neural networks with classical algorithms. The CLRS Algorithmic Reasoning Benchmark (CLRS) consolidates and extends previous work torward evaluation algorithmic reasoning by providing a suite of implementations of classical algorithms. These algorithms have been selected from the third edition of the standard Introduction to Algorithms by Cormen, Leiserson, Rivest and Stein.
Installation
The CLRS Algorithmic Reasoning Benchmark can be installed with pip directly from GitHub, with the following command:
pip install git+git://github.com/deepmind/clrs.git
or from PyPI:
pip install dm-clrs
Getting started
To set up a Python virtual environment with the required dependencies, run:
python3 -m venv clrs_env
source clrs_env/bin/activate
python setup.py install
and to run our example baseline model:
python -m clrs.examples.run
Algorithms as graphs
CLRS implements the selected algorithms in an idiomatic way, which aligns as closely as possible to the original CLRS 3ed pseudocode. By controlling the input data distribution to conform to the preconditions we are able to automatically generate input/output pairs. We additionally provide trajectories of "hints" that expose the internal state of each algorithm, to both optionally simplify the learning challenge and to distinguish between different algorithms that solve the same overall task (e.g. sorting).
In the most generic sense, algorithms can be seen as manipulating sets of objects, along with any relations between them (which can themselves be decomposed into binary relations). Accordingly, we study all of the algorithms in this benchmark using a graph representation. In the event that objects obey a more strict ordered structure (e.g. arrays or rooted trees), we impose this ordering through inclusion of predecessor links.
How it works
For each algorithm, we provide a canonical set of train, eval and test trajectories for benchmarking out-of-distribution generalization.
| Trajectories | Problem Size | |
|---|---|---|
| Train | 1000 | 16 |
| Eval | 32 | 16 |
| Test | 32 | 64 |
where "problem size" refers to e.g. the length of an array or number of nodes in a graph, depending on the algorithm. These trajectories can be used like so:
train_ds, spec = clrs.clrs21_train("bfs")
for step in range(num_train_steps):
feedback = train_sampler.next(batch_size)
model.train(feedback.features)
Here, feedback is a namedtuple with the following structure:
Feedback = collections.namedtuple('Feedback', ['features', 'outputs'])
Features = collections.namedtuple('Features', ['inputs', 'hints', 'lengths'])
where the content of Features can be used for training and outputs is reserved for evaluation. Each field of the tuple is an ndarray with a leading batch dimension. Because hints are provided for the full algorithm trajectory, these contain an additional time dimension padded up to the maximum length max(T) of any trajectory within the dataset. The lengths field specifies the true length t <= max(T) for each trajectory, which can be used e.g. for loss masking.
Please see the examples directory for full working Graph Neural Network (GNN) examples using JAX and the DeepMind JAX Ecosystem of libraries.
What we provide
Algorithms
Our initial CLRS-21 benchmark includes the following 21 algorithms. More algorithms will be supported in the near future.
- Divide and conquer
- Maximum subarray (Kadane)
- Dynamic programming
- Matrix chain order
- Optimal binary search tree
- Graphs
- Depth-first search
- Breadth-first search
- Topological sort
- Minimum spanning tree (Prim)
- Single-source shortest-path (Bellman Ford)
- Single-source shortest-path (Dijsktra)
- DAG shortest paths
- All-pairs shortest-path (Floyd Warshall)
- Greedy
- Task scheduling
- Searching
- Minimum
- Binary search
- Quickselect
- Sorting
- Insertion sort
- Bubble sort
- Heapsort
- Quicksort
- Strings
- String matcher (naive)
- String matcher (KMP)
Baselines
We additionally provide JAX implementations of the following GNN baselines:
- Graph Attention Networks (Velickovic et al., ICLR 2018)
- Message-Passing Neural Networks (Gilmer et al., ICML 2017)
Citation
To cite the CLRS Algorithmic Reasoning Benchmark:
@article{deepmind2021clrs,
author = {Petar Veli\v{c}kovi\'{c} and Adri\`{a} Puigdom\`{e}nech Badia and
David Budden and Razvan Pascanu and Andrea Banino and Misha Dashevskiy and
Raia Hadsell and Charles Blundell},
title = {The CLRS Algorithmic Reasoning Benchmark},
year = {2021},
}
17 Dec 18, 2022
59 Dec 09, 2022
3 Jan 11, 2022
294 Jan 05, 2023
1 Jan 13, 2022
66 Nov 03, 2022
31 Dec 13, 2022
7 Dec 18, 2022
21 Jan 03, 2023
23 Dec 13, 2022
23 Oct 20, 2022
2.1k Jan 06, 2023
82 Jun 26, 2022
4 Sep 09, 2022
169 Dec 22, 2022
5 Dec 17, 2021
2 Jan 30, 2022
214 Jan 01, 2023
2.6k Jan 06, 2023
30 Dec 22, 2022